Archive for the ‘Trusts Wills and Probate’ Category

Overheard Comments Don’t Support Conspiracy Theory

A case in which a conspiracy to suppress a will was alleged has failed in the High Court.
 
The claimant argued that a will which benefited her (she was the long-term girlfriend of the deceased) had been discovered by members of the deceased man’s family and that it was suppressed. The main evidence for her claim came from an electrician who was working in the house when the family searched for the will. He recalled hearing the family read out the will and remembered its principal terms.
 
Although the electrician clearly had an excellent memory and was regarded as a reliable witness, the judge ruled that the burden of proof had not been discharged to prove the content of the ‘missing will’.
 
He declined to accept that an earlier, unsigned will should be probated and ruled that the man’s estate should be distributed according to the law of intestacy.

Attorney Pleads Guilty

Scarcely a week goes by without another tale of the abuse of an elderly and vulnerable person being in the press.
 
Recently, a woman pleaded guilty to extracting £60,000 from her dying mother’s account whilst operating under a power of attorney (POA). The guilty plea was made after the Crown Prosecution Service claimed that the real extent of the theft was more than £100,000.
 
Giving a person a POA is not a decision to be taken lightly. However, steps can be taken to ensure that such a power is difficult to abuse and having a POA can make dealing with a person’s affairs much easier if they become incapable of dealing with them.
 
Some attorneys believe, wrongly, that the funds over which they have the power are ‘theirs’ and they can do as they like with them. This can lead to unintended difficulties with other family members.
 
We can advise you on all aspects of powers of attorney and your rights and responsibilities if you are appointed someone’s attorney.

Landlords and Disability – Reminder

Disability Discrimination Act & Landlords - Solicitors Birmingham

Despite the issues raised by the recent Malcolm case, landlords can feel reassured that the legal obligation to make premises ‘disability-friendly’ does have some limits.

In a recent case in the Court of Appeal a disabled tenant requested consent for a stairlift to be installed in the building where she lives to provide access to the third floor of the building, where the only other access to her flat was via a communal staircase. The landlord refused the request and the tenant claimed that the refusal constituted discrimination on the grounds of disability.

The landlord argued that there was no discrimination and that the refusal was not based on disability but instaead was a lawful refusal which would have  been refused from any tenant.

The Court of Appeal agreed and found that the landlord's reasons for refusal were not related to the tenant’s disability.

Landlords should still be very careful in this area of law, we can advise and assist based on general principles, our experience and the latest case law and legislation.

RSPCA Fail To Persuade Court

In a recent High Court case, the RSPCA lost its claim over a legacy in a controversial decision concerning a dispute over a loosely-worded will. Even though the judge criticised the charity for bringing the claim, and ordered indemnity costs to the family involved, the RSPCA is appealing against the decision. The appeal will be heard next month.  
 
The deceased had left his property, valued at £169,000, to his lifelong friends. He also left a legacy to his brother and his friends. His will stated that any Inheritance Tax (IHT) due on the property should be paid out of the residue of his estate and also that the pecuniary legacies were to be gifts, valued at the maximum amount that would not incur IHT. The RSPCA was to receive whatever was left of the estate after these distributions had been made.
 
The issue arose because the man’s will stated that any IHT due was to be paid out of the residue. The RSPCA claimed that the clear intention of the will was that the estate should not pay IHT and the house was included as part of the IHT ‘nil rate band’. Had its argument been successful, this would have significantly reduced the amount received by the deceased’s brother and friends.
 
The judge concluded that the meaning of the will was that the amount that should pass under the pecuniary legacy was the amount equal to the nil-rate band in force at the date of death, namely, £300,000. He held that IHT was payable on the value of the house grossed up. The decision meant that the RSPCA was left with substantially less than it would have received had its interpretation of the terms of the will been accepted.
 
This dispute could have been avoided had the terms of the will been more precise. Charities often vigorously pursue their interests if their interpretation of a will indicates that they may benefit from so doing. If you wish to make a charity a beneficiary under your will, contact us for advice.

Missing Will Allegation Baulks Estate Claim

A claim that a man’s £350,000 estate should be dealt with under the laws of intestacy has been challenged by the man’s former lover, who claims a will made in her favour was ‘suppressed’ by his children.
 
Under the laws of intestacy, unless she can prove to the satisfaction of the court that such a will existed and she was a beneficiary under it, his former lover will have no claim against the estate unless she is able to claim as a dependant of the deceased. She claims that the man, a  businessman who in later life gave advice at his local Citizen’s Advice Bureau, understood the effects of intestacy and ‘must’ have left a will.

Until the matter is decided, the administration of the estate cannot be completed.

Make sure your will is stored safely and your beneficiaries know its whereabouts: contact us for advice on all wills and trust matters.

Time to Review Trusts

On 6 April 2011, many trusts will cease to be as attractive a vehicle in which to hold assets as they were when they were originally set up and so now is a good time to review any trusts with the proposed changes in mind.
 
In particular, the position regarding undistributed income in the trust should be given some thought – if there is too much retained income, a tax charge may arise under Section 496 of the Income Tax Act 2007. On the other hand, if the ‘tax pool’ is sufficiently large, delaying a distribution until after the start of the 2010/2011 tax year may be beneficial, although this will depend on the personal tax situation of the beneficiary.
 
Another planning point is to consider creating a revocable interest in possession for beneficiaries to be put in place before the end of this tax year.
 
We can advise you on all trust and tax matters.

Don’t Risk Intestacy!

The  problems of dying intestate can be considerable, even if your estate will not be large enough to be subject to Inheritance Tax, yet recent research indicates that 58 per cent of adults in the UK and 74 per cent of those who are cohabiting do not have a will.

According to the YouGov poll -
  • 32 per cent of those who have not yet made a will said they had ‘always meant to but never got round to it’
  • Of the people over age 55 surveyed, 25 per cent said they did not feel the need to make a will because their estate would go to their families in any case
  • 61 per cent of those surveyed who had made a will had done so before the age of 41. 23 per cent had completed the process as part of general financial planning and 22 per cent saw having children as the main reason for executing a will.
If you die without making a will, your estate and possessions will be divided according to the rules of intestacy. There are no guarantees that the distribution will correspond with your intentions. This is of particular importance to those living with a partner, as a surviving partner does not have the same inheritance rights as a spouse or civil partner. Taking the simple precaution of making your wishes known in a properly drafted will can prevent exposing your loved ones to financial difficulty.
 
Whatever your situation, the making of a will ensures that your wishes are complied with, but it can also help to minimise the tax burden when you die. In addition, it is normally possible to administer a testate estate more quickly than one that is intestate.

IHT and Transfers to Spouses: Documents You Need to Retain

Because transfers of assets between spouses or civil partners normally have no tax consequences for IHT purposes, it is easy to fall into the trap of thinking that there is nothing which needs to be done when making such transfers or when passing over the unused proportion of the IHT ‘tax free’ allowance in the event of one partner’s death. In fact, specific documents are required when the estate of the surviving partner is administered.
 
HM Revenue and Customs’ guidance on the procedure for claiming the balance of the IHT nil rate band on the death of the second spouse or civil partner shows that the retention of these documents is important.
 
The personal representatives of the deceased will be required to supply the claim accompanied by the following documents relating to his or her late spouse or civil partner:
 
  • the death certificate;
  • the marriage or civil partnership certificate;
  • a copy of the grant of representation (confirmation, where the deceased died in Scotland);
  • the will (if any); and
  • any deed of variation.
 
It is widely thought that the ‘excess’ of unused transfers (i.e. the difference between the transfers made and the nil rate band at the date of death) simply passes across to a surviving spouse or civil partner, but this is not the case. The way the transfer works is more complex.
 
It is recommended that the required documents are assembled and stored in a safe place, together with your will.

Statutory Wills

It is a source of concern to lawyers and families alike that the majority of people never make a will. Often, the intention to make a will is there, but somehow the person never seems to ‘get around to it’ and dies or becomes incapable before a will can be made.
 
It is possible, however, for a will to be written for someone who lacks the mental capacity to make one. The Court of Protection can, when there are objectively reasonable grounds for doing so, order that a statutory will is created. Such a will can be a variation on an earlier will or, where there is no earlier will, a will can be written from scratch to prevent the estate being distributed according to the laws of intestacy. Sometimes, a statutory will is desired when there has been a change in the circumstances of someone who has an existing will which is no longer appropriate.
 
For a statutory will to be created for someone, that person must lack the mental capacity to do this for him or herself. The task which faces the Court of Protection is to create the will which would have been written by the person at that time were he or she mentally competent to do so. In doing this the Court will consider the known views and attitudes of that person with regard to relevant matters and people. The Court will not try to steer the middle path in order to ‘keep the peace’ within a family if it is the Court’s view that that is not what the person would have done.
 
To have a statutory will prepared, sufficient evidence must be gathered regarding the person’s lack of mental capability. Only if the Court is convinced that the evidence is there will it permit a statutory will to be drawn up. The Court will then take account of the person’s circumstances and known views in order to take a reasoned view of the content of the will.
 
If a statutory will is being considered, it is important to take legal advice early in the process, especially where the statutory will is intended to vary an earlier will, as there may well be technical legal issues to address. Consideration will also need to be given at an early stage to possible claims on the estate by dependants. Once all the necessary information has been gathered, it is presented to the Court, which will consider the evidence before it: the Court will seek to take a ‘broad brush’ approach and will not seek to create a will filled with detailed provisions.
 
An application for a statutory will can be made by:
 
·        the receiver for a patient under the Mental Health Act or the person who has applied for the appointment of a receiver if none has yet been appointed;
·        anyone who would benefit from the person’s known will or under the application of the intestacy rules;
·        any person for whom it might be reasonably expected that provision would be made under the will;
·        the person’s attorney; or
·        any other person authorised by the Court.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Care Home Fees and Your Home

Normally, an elderly person who lives in a care home is required to pay all or part of the cost of their care based on criteria laid down in the Charging for Residential Accommodation Guide (CRAG).
 
A local authority is not required to charge for care where the period of accommodation lasts for fewer than eight weeks. After eight weeks, the local authority must charge at the standard rate and carry out an assessment of means to ascertain the appropriate level of charge to be made to the resident. A resident who refuses to be assessed will pay the full standard rate without contribution from the local authority.
 
The means assessment is based on the capital and income of the resident. The home of a resident is disregarded when they intend to return to it and it is still available for them to occupy, or they are taking reasonable steps to dispose of it in order to acquire another home to which they intend to return after temporary residence in the care home. A property owned jointly with others will be considered to be an asset proportionate to the number of joint owners, so where there are three owners, a one third share of the total value would apply. There are special rules governing the valuation for assessment purposes of properties held in different legal forms or where the property is difficult to realise.
 
In general terms, financial assets are regarded as part of the resident’s capital but personal property is not, provided the purpose of the acquisition of the personal property was not to avoid the amount of assessable capital. There are special rules for some types of investment, such as insurance bonds.
 
Generally, the income assessment includes all income, although there can be exceptions where appropriate, such as, for example, for business income where the business is being sold.
 
At present, a resident in a council care home must use their own capital to pay for their care until the capital is reduced to £23,000. After that, a contribution is made on a reducing scale until the resident’s capital is reduced to £14,000. This is done by the local council assessing each additional £250 of capital as producing an income of £1 per week. When the capital is reduced to £14,000, no further contribution is necessary.
 
The value of a house is not taken into account as capital for the first 12 weeks of residential care and is not taken into account at all if your spouse or civil partner continues to live there. However, if a permanent transfer to a care home is likely, as is often the case, then the home becomes an assessable asset. It may be thought, therefore, that it is a good idea to transfer the home to (say) a family member so it falls out of assessment. However, when an attempt has been made to manipulate the income or capital of the resident to prevent it falling into assessment, for example by transferring an assessable asset, CRAG allows the local authority to make an assessment to recover the charge from the person to whom an asset has been transferred in the six months prior to admission to the care home. In principle, if the purpose of the transfer is to avoid care home costs, the council can challenge a transfer made at any time, so even if if the transfer happened more than six months before you moved into care, it can assess you as if you still own the assets.
 
It is naïve to think that simply transferring assets shortly before going into a care home will be effective as a way of avoiding liability for the fees. Any arrangements to transfer assets should be part of a family wealth preservation plan based on advice from your solicitor.